igraphJames Holland Jones
12/20/2017
igraph is a package that provides tools for the analysis and visualization of networkslibrary(igraph)A graph is simply a collection of vertices (or nodes) and edges (or ties).
We can denote this \(\mathcal{G}(V,E)\), where \(V\) is a the vertex set and \(E\) is the edge set.
The vertices of the graph represent the actors in the social system. These are usually individual people, but they could be households, geographical localities, institutions, or other social entities.
The edges of the graph represent the relations between these entities (e.g., “is friends with” or “has sexual intercourse with” or “sends money to”). These edges can be directed (e.g., “sends money to”) or undirected (e.g., “within 2 meters of”).
When the relations that define the graph are directional, we have a directed graph or digraph.
Graphs (and digraphs) can be binary (i.e., presence/absence of a relationship) or valued (e.g., “groomed five times in the observation period”, “sent $100”).
A graph (with no self-loops) with \(n\) vertices has \({n \choose 2} = n(n-1)/2\) possible unordered pairs. This number (which can get very big!) is important for defining the density of a graph, i.e., the fraction of all possible relations that actually exist in a network.
Collection of vertices (or nodes) and undirected edges (or ties), denoted \(\mathcal{G}(V,E)\), where \(V\) is a the vertex set and \(E\) is the edge set.
Collection of vertices (or nodes) and directed edges.
Graph where all the nodes of a graph can be partitioned into two sets \(\mathcal{V}_1\) and \(\mathcal{V}_2\) such that for all edges in the graph connects and unordered pair where one vertex comes from \(\mathcal{V}_1\) and the other from \(\mathcal{V}_2\). Often called an “affiliation graph” as bipartite graphs are used to represent people’s affiliations to organizations or events.
require(igraph)
g <- make_graph( c(1,2, 1,3, 2,3, 2,4, 3,5, 4,5), n=5, dir=FALSE )
plot(g, vertex.color="lightblue")Create a small graph using graph_from_literal()
Undirected edges are indicated with one or more dashes -, --, etc. It doesn’t matter how many dashes you use – you can use as many as you want to make your code more readable.
The colon operator : links “vertex sets” – i.e., creates ties between all members of two groups of vertices
g <- graph_from_literal(Fred-Daphne:Velma-Shaggy, Fred-Shaggy-Scooby)
plot(g, vertex.shape="none", vertex.label.color="black")Make directed edges using -+ where the plus indicates the direction of the arrow, i.e., A --+ B creates a directed edge from A to B
A mutual edge can be created using +-+
# empty graph
g0 <- make_empty_graph(20)
plot(g0, vertex.color="lightblue", vertex.size=10, vertex.label=NA)# full graph
g1 <- make_full_graph(20)
plot(g1, vertex.color="lightblue", vertex.size=10, vertex.label=NA)# ring
g2 <- make_ring(20)
plot(g2, vertex.color="lightblue", vertex.size=10, vertex.label=NA)# lattice
g3 <- make_lattice(dimvector=c(10,10))
plot(g3, vertex.color="lightblue", vertex.size=10, vertex.label=NA)# tree
g4 <- make_tree(20, children = 3, mode = "undirected")
plot(g4, vertex.color="lightblue", vertex.size=10, vertex.label=NA)# star
g5 <- make_star(20, mode="undirected")
plot(g5, vertex.color="lightblue", vertex.size=10, vertex.label=NA)# Erdos-Renyi Random Graph
g6 <- sample_gnm(n=100,m=50)
plot(g6, vertex.color="lightblue", vertex.size=5, vertex.label=NA)# Power Law
g7 <- sample_pa(n=100, power=1.5, m=1, directed=FALSE)
plot(g7, vertex.color="lightblue", vertex.size=5, vertex.label=NA)Sometimes you want to plot two (or more) graphs together
The disjoint union operator allows you to merge two graphs with different vertex sets
plot(g4 %du% g7, vertex.color="lightblue", vertex.size=5, vertex.label=NA)gg <- g4 %du% g7
gg <- rewire(gg, each_edge(prob = 0.3))
plot(gg, vertex.color="lightblue", vertex.size=5, vertex.label=NA)## retain only the connected component
gg <- induced.subgraph(gg, subcomponent(gg,1))
plot(gg, vertex.color="lightblue", vertex.size=5, vertex.label=NA)You can add arbitrary attributes to both vertices and edges. Generally, you do this to store information for plotting: colors, edge weights, names, etc.
Some attributes are automatically created when you construct an graph object (e.g., “name” or “weight” if you load a weighted adjacency matrix)
V(g) accesses vertex attributes
E(g) accesses edge attributes
## look at the structure
g4## IGRAPH 3558487 U--- 20 19 -- Tree
## + attr: name (g/c), children (g/n), mode (g/c)
## + edges from 3558487:
## [1] 1-- 2 1-- 3 1-- 4 2-- 5 2-- 6 2-- 7 3-- 8 3-- 9 3--10 4--11 4--12
## [12] 4--13 5--14 5--15 5--16 6--17 6--18 6--19 7--20
V(g4)$name <- LETTERS[1:20]
## see how it's changed
g4## IGRAPH 3558487 UN-- 20 19 -- Tree
## + attr: name (g/c), children (g/n), mode (g/c), name (v/c)
## + edges from 3558487 (vertex names):
## [1] A--B A--C A--D B--E B--F B--G C--H C--I C--J D--K D--L D--M E--N E--O
## [15] E--P F--Q F--R F--S G--T
## see what I did there?
## do some other stuff
V(g4)$vertex.color <- "Pink"
E(g4)$edge.color <- "SkyBlue2"
plot(g4, vertex.size=10, vertex.label=NA, vertex.color=V(g4)$vertex.color,
edge.color=E(g4)$edge.color, edge.width=3)Most primatologists/behavioral ecologists probably have experience thinking in terms of adjacency matrices
An example of an adjacency matrix is the pairwise interaction matrices (e.g., agonistic or affiliative interactions) that we construct from behavioral observations
A very important potential gotcha: when you read data into R, it will be in the form of a data frame. Converting an adjacency matrix to an igraph graph object requires the data to be in the matrix class. Therefore, you need to coerce the data you read in by wrapping your read.table() in an as.matrix() command.
kids <- as.matrix(
read.table("/Users/jhj1/Teaching/social_networks/data/strayer_strayer1976-fig2.txt",
header=FALSE)
)
kid.names <- c("Ro","Ss","Br","If","Td","Sd","Pe","Ir","Cs","Ka",
"Ch","Ty","Gl","Sa", "Me","Ju","Sh")
colnames(kids) <- kid.names
rownames(kids) <- kid.names
g <- graph_from_adjacency_matrix(kids, mode="directed", weighted=TRUE)
lay <- layout_with_fr(g)
plot(g,edge.width=log2(E(g)$weight)+1, layout=lay, vertex.color="lightblue")Adjacency matrices are actually very inefficient
Most sociomatrices are quite sparse
Cost of an adjacency matrix increases as \(k^2\)
Edge Lists are much more efficient
Various algorithms for detecting clusters of similar vertices – i.e., “communities”
Use fastgreedy.community() to identify clusters in Kapferer’s tailor shop and color the vertices based on their membership
fastgreedy.community() identifies four clusters
These clusters are listed as numbers in fg$membership
Use this vector to index vertex colors
A <- as.matrix(
read.table(file="/Users/jhj1/Teaching/social_networks/code/kapferer-tailorshop1.txt",
header=TRUE, row.names=1)
)
G <- graph.adjacency(A, mode="undirected", diag=FALSE)
fg <- fastgreedy.community(G)
cols <- c("blue","red","black","magenta")
plot(G, vertex.shape="none",
vertex.label.cex=0.75, edge.color=grey(0.85),
edge.width=1, vertex.label.color=cols[fg$membership])# another approach to visualizing
plot(fg,G,vertex.label=NA)The layout is of any given plot is random (e.g., plot the same graph repeatedly and you’ll see that the layout changes with each plot)
igraph provides a tool for tinkering with the layout called tkplot()
Call tkplot() and it will open an X11 window (on Macs at least)
Select and drag the vertices into the layout you want, then use tkplot.getcoords(gid) to get the coordinates (where gid is the graph id returned when calling tkplot() on your graph)
tkplot() window of triangle graph
g <- graph( c(1,2, 2,3, 1,3), n=3, dir=FALSE)
plot(g)#tkplot(g)
#tkplot.getcoords(1)
### do some stuff with tkplot() and get coords which we call tri.coords
## tkplot(g)
## tkplot.getcoords(1) ## the plot id may be different depending on how many times you've called tkplot()
## [,1] [,2]
##[1,] 228 416
##[2,] 436 0
##[3,] 20 0
tri.coords <- matrix( c(228,416, 436,0, 20,0), nr=3, nc=2, byrow=TRUE)
par(mfrow=c(1,2))
plot(g, vertex.color="lightblue")
plot(g, layout=tri.coords, vertex.color="lightblue")davismat <- as.matrix(
read.table(file="/Users/jhj1/Teaching/social_networks/data/davismat.txt",
row.names=1, header=TRUE)
)
southern <- graph_from_incidence_matrix(davismat)
V(southern)$shape <- c(rep("circle",18), rep("square",14))
V(southern)$color <- c(rep("blue",18), rep("red", 14))
plot(southern, layout=layout.bipartite)## not so beautiful
## did some tinkering using tkplot()...
x <- c(rep(23,18), rep(433,14))
y <- c(44.32432, 0.00000, 132.97297, 77.56757, 22.16216, 110.81081, 155.13514,
199.45946, 177.29730, 243.78378, 332.43243, 410.00000, 387.83784, 354.59459,
310.27027, 221.62162, 265.94595, 288.10811, 0.00000, 22.16216, 44.32432,
66.48649, 88.64865, 132.97297, 166.21622, 199.45946, 277.02703, 365.67568,
310.27027, 343.51351, 387.83784, 410.00000)
southern.layout <- cbind(x,y)
plot(southern, layout=southern.layout)The incidence matrix is \(n \times k\), where \(n\) is the number of actors and \(k\) is the number of events
Project the incidence matrix \(X\) into social space, creating a sociomatrix \(A\), \(\mathbf{A} = \mathbf{X}\, \mathbf{X}^T\)
This transforms the \(n \times k\) into an \(n \times n\) sociomatrix
#Sociomatrix
(f2f <- davismat %*% t(davismat))## EVELYN LAURA THERESA BRENDA CHARLOTTE FRANCES ELEANOR PEARL RUTH
## EVELYN 8 6 7 6 3 4 3 3 3
## LAURA 6 7 6 6 3 4 4 2 3
## THERESA 7 6 8 6 4 4 4 3 4
## BRENDA 6 6 6 7 4 4 4 2 3
## CHARLOTTE 3 3 4 4 4 2 2 0 2
## FRANCES 4 4 4 4 2 4 3 2 2
## ELEANOR 3 4 4 4 2 3 4 2 3
## PEARL 3 2 3 2 0 2 2 3 2
## RUTH 3 3 4 3 2 2 3 2 4
## VERNE 2 2 3 2 1 1 2 2 3
## MYRNA 2 1 2 1 0 1 1 2 2
## KATHERINE 2 1 2 1 0 1 1 2 2
## SYLVIA 2 2 3 2 1 1 2 2 3
## NORA 2 2 3 2 1 1 2 2 2
## HELEN 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 2
## DOROTHY 2 1 2 1 0 1 1 2 2
## OLIVIA 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1
## FLORA 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1
## VERNE MYRNA KATHERINE SYLVIA NORA HELEN DOROTHY OLIVIA FLORA
## EVELYN 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 1
## LAURA 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 0 0
## THERESA 3 2 2 3 3 2 2 1 1
## BRENDA 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 0 0
## CHARLOTTE 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0
## FRANCES 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0
## ELEANOR 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 0 0
## PEARL 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 1
## RUTH 3 2 2 3 2 2 2 1 1
## VERNE 4 3 3 4 3 3 2 1 1
## MYRNA 3 4 4 4 3 3 2 1 1
## KATHERINE 3 4 6 6 5 3 2 1 1
## SYLVIA 4 4 6 7 6 4 2 1 1
## NORA 3 3 5 6 8 4 1 2 2
## HELEN 3 3 3 4 4 5 1 1 1
## DOROTHY 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 1
## OLIVIA 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2
## FLORA 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2
gf2f <- graph_from_adjacency_matrix(f2f, mode="undirected", diag=FALSE, add.rownames=TRUE)
gf2f <- simplify(gf2f)
plot(gf2f, vertex.color="lightblue")## who is the most central?
cb <- betweenness(gf2f)
#plot(gf2f,vertex.size=cb*10, vertex.color="lightblue")
plot(gf2f,vertex.label.cex=1+cb/2, vertex.shape="none")### this gives you the number of women at each event (diagonal) or mutually at 2 events
(e2e <- t(davismat) %*% davismat)## E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 E6 E7 E8 E9 E10 E11 E12 E13 E14
## E1 3 2 3 2 3 3 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0
## E2 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 2 0 0 0 0 0
## E3 3 3 6 4 6 5 4 5 2 0 0 0 0 0
## E4 2 2 4 4 4 3 3 3 2 0 0 0 0 0
## E5 3 3 6 4 8 6 6 7 3 0 0 0 0 0
## E6 3 3 5 3 6 8 5 7 4 1 1 1 1 1
## E7 2 2 4 3 6 5 10 8 5 3 2 4 2 2
## E8 3 3 5 3 7 7 8 14 9 4 1 5 2 2
## E9 1 2 2 2 3 4 5 9 12 4 3 5 3 3
## E10 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 4 4 5 2 5 3 3
## E11 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 3 2 4 2 1 1
## E12 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 5 5 5 2 6 3 3
## E13 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 3 3 1 3 3 3
## E14 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 3 3 1 3 3 3
ge2e <- graph_from_adjacency_matrix(e2e, mode="undirected", diag=FALSE, add.rownames=TRUE)
ge2e <- simplify(ge2e)
plot(ge2e, vertex.color="lightblue")